Advances Professional Knowledge and Practice †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Advances Professional Knowledge and Practice. Answer: Introduction The conceptual framework of accounting is crucial for every company in the modern scenario to comply with because it facilitates in enhancing the meaningfulness of financial information present in the statements. Besides, the users of financial reporting can easily interpret the financial information for the purpose of making effective decisions (Petersen Plenborg, 2012). Meanwhile, in the absence of such conceptual framework, understandability, relevance, reliability, and many more qualitative characteristics of financial reporting cannot be obtained, thereby degrading the process of corporate reporting as a whole. Moreover, based on the complications in the current working environment, the prevalence of conceptual framework is vital for all stakeholders in their decision-making process (Peirson et. al, 2015). With the help of this report, an evaluation of BMW Groups attempt will be made in order to ensure whether the organization has met the obligations of the conceptual framework for reporting. BMW Group emphasizes the requirement of the conceptual framework of financial reporting within its affairs because it believes that satisfaction of customers is very necessary for such complicated and competitive working environment. The company has guaranteed user access to necessary data in order to make them understand the quality and characteristics of financial reporting and making available procedures and policies to facilitate accurate interpretation on the part of users, thereby enhancing the objectives of corporate reporting (Cooper et. al, 2011). For instance, in order to compute the benefits and costs of an actual item, the Group differentiates betwixt financial and non-financial value (BMW, 2016). Such financial value is computed through utilization of methods for computing the capital value, the effectiveness of costs, etc. Besides, the comparison of what is intended to be invested and what is required to be obtained from such investment results in a financial viewpoint. Furthermore, the non-financial value is computed using a scoring model of the Group. Overall, both these values are taken into account by BMW when a negative or positive decision is required to be undertaken for an action item (Conceptual Framework, 2016). This consideration sheds light on the fact that conceptual framework of accounting is being taken into account by BMW in order to ensure that the users can use both financial and non-financial value in order to make decisions about its action items. Furthermore, the Group has disclosed proper information regarding how efficiently it has discharged its responsibilities in utilizing its current resources (BMW, 2016). Moreover, prospective for future cash inflows have also been disclosed by the Group that can allow stakeholders in making significant decisions. The link betwixt value-added and key value drivers have also been considered by the Group that allows it to attain the objectives of the conceptual framework of accounting (La psley, 2012). Overall, the business model of the Group aligns with a value-based approach that is intended towards attaining consistent growth, profitability, enhancing the business value of safeguarding jobs and capital providers. Lastly, in order to consider the objectives of conceptual framework of accounting, the Group has provided detailed information about its financial performance tenure by reflecting variations in its financial claims and funds other than those attained from creditors and investors so that they can evaluate the future and past capability of the Group to generate inflows of net cash (Baluch et. al, 2011). These factors clearly highlight that the Group has considered the objective of the conceptual framework for the object of its reporting. The accounting policies of BMW Group are prepared by fulfilling the German Commercial Code and the financial statements are prepared by complying with the IFRS requirements. The difference betwixt these policies emerges in connection with intangible assets capitalization, the establishment of valuation units, measurement and recognition of financial instruments, and recognition and provision of deferred tax assets. Risks, rewards, and opportunities In relation to opportunities and risks associated with raw materials, a detailed method for hedging and risk measurement is applied by the Group in conjunction with commodity and currency risks. If the Group fulfils its recognition criteria, derivatives that are used as hedges will then be accounted for the purpose of hedging relationships (BMW, 2016). In relation to foreign currency translation, the financial statements drawn up in foreign currencies are translated by utilizing the modified method of closing rate. The liabilities and assets are transformed at their exchange rate (closing) whereas the expenses and incomes are also transformed at their aggregate rate of exchange. Further, variances betwixt such translation are reflected in accumulated other equity section of the Group (Davies Crawford, 2012). Moreover, foreign currency payables and receivables are accounted for through initial recognition basis by considering the rate present at the first-time recognition date. In relation to the Groups revenue, the same is recognized when rewards and risks of goods ownership are being offered to the customer taking into account that such revenue amount can be reliably measured. Moreover, the Groups revenues are reflected net of bonuses, discount, and rebates. Furthermore, profits arising on sale of vehicles (that contains a repurchase commitment) are not immediately recognized (BMW, 2016). The distinction betwixt buyback and sales price is presented as deferred income and recognized in instalments as revenues over the tenure of the contract. In addition, revenues associated with arrangements of operating lease are recognized on a straight-line way over the tenure of lease (Deegan, 2011). These are not recognized until there is surety that the situations annexed have been adhered to and the grants have been obtained. Further, the resulting outcome is recognized in sales costs over the necessary tenures to align them with associated costs that are intended to be compensated (BMW, 2016). Internally-generated and purchased intangible assets are recognized as assets when it is assured that the utilization of such asset can generate future financial effectiveness and where the assets cost can be ascertained properly (Choi Meek, 2011). These assets are measured at their manufacturing and/or acquisition cost excluding borrowing expenses, and to the extent that they possess a useful finite life that is amortized on a straight-line manner over their expected useful lives. Impairment of intangible assets In order to facilitate impairment tests, carrying value of an asset is compared with that of its recoverable value. If the fair value of such asset is lesser than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized by decreasing its carrying amount to the assets higher value in use or fair value minus selling costs (BMW, 2016). If the reason for a past recognized impairment loss does not prevail, the impairment loss is then altered to the level of recoverable value. The leased items of BMW Group are taken into account on initial recognition at their respective fair values or at their net current amount of the minimum lease payments (if lower). Moreover, the liabilities for such future lease installments are also recognized as financial liabilities that are considered at their net current value. The impairment of such items is recognized in the same way as in the case of intangible assets (Gibson, 2010). On initial recognition, such Groups financial assets are considered at their fair amounts and transaction expenses are also included in such fair value unless they are assigned to fair value measurement of financial assets through loss or profit segment. Further, such financial instruments that are present for trading or held for sale for which application of fair value is done, are also taken into account at their respective fair values (BMW, 2016). The Groups deferred taxes are recognized on all temporary distinctions betwixt accounting and tax bases of liabilities and assets, and on consolidation processes. Fundamental and enhancing guidelines BMW Group is committed to sustainability reporting within its framework and for such purpose, it has drawn its sustainable value report based on GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) G4. Such report aligns with the comprehensive option wherein all indicators and significant information of essential aspects are reported by the Group (BMW, 2016). Moreover, this also proves adherence to the relevance fundamental characteristic of corporate reporting. Another fundamental guideline implemented within the Group is its risk management strategy that allows every manager and employee to report any type of recognized risk through the effective reporting channels. With the help of such enhancing guideline, the Group can easily manage external and internal risks that can pose a threat to its intended purposes or goals. Another fundamental guideline adopted by the Group is its strategy of information and communication. Such guideline is a significant part of its internal control system that ensures information to be readily available to those who are liable for a proper functioning of the Groups procedures (BMW, 2016). With the help of such guideline, the Group ensures that information is provided to the stakeholders in a timely and appropriate manner. This ensures the compliance of reliability and timeliness qualitative characteristic of financial reporting (Horngren, 2013). The Group also pursues an extensive control function in its framework that plays a key role in compliance with internal guidelines and legal requirements. With the prevalence of such fundamental guideline of extensive control, BMW gains the opportunity to minimize the feasi bilities of risks and additional monitoring of overall organizational processes (Carmichael Graham , 2012). The Group also has a Business Relations Compliance Program that is aimed at assuring the reliability of its business interconnections. Besides, such program also assists in communication measures that in turn plays a key role in enhancing the qualitative reliability characteristic of financial reporting (Kaplan, 2011). These fundamental and enhancing guidelines undertaken by BMW allows it to sustain a competitive advantage in the market and this cannot be feasible if it does not prioritize effectiveness of conceptual framework for accounting. Recommendation Even though BMW has reported relevant and reliable information about its financial and non-financial measures of performance, yet the information that is not vital for the users in making decisions is also reflected in its financial statements. In other words, financial statements must accommodate only meaningful information and add irrelevant information can enhance the complication level in the minds of users (Kruger, 2015). Therefore, in order to enhance the effectiveness of general purpose financial reporting and conceptual framework of corporate reporting, information that are essential must only form part of the financial statements (Brigham Daves, 2012). This means that key indicators of both financial and non-financial performance are sufficient for stakeholders to make decisions. Moreover, taking into account the level of complications in the present corporate environment, creating complications in the financial statements can result in various issues for the company in fut ure. Conclusion BMW Group has efficiently adhered to the objective of the conceptual framework of financial reporting by reporting meaningful, relevant, and reliable information to its users that can allow them in making proper decisions. Besides, such information includes understandable details regarding its recognition criteria that can allow stakeholders in ascertaining meaningful information related to its accounting policies and estimates. Furthermore, the fundamental and enhancing guidelines of the Group also allows it to adhere to the obligations of the conceptual framework of accounting through adequate and timely disclosure of relevant information and mitigating risks that may emerge in the way of effective financial reporting. These factors highlight the fact that BMW has given due importance to the usefulness of conceptual framework by fulfilling all its obligations. References BMW 2016. BMW Annual report and accounts 2016. [online] Available at: https://www.bmwgroup.com/content/dam/bmw-group-websites/bmwgroup_com/ir/downloads/en/2016/BMW_GB16_en_Finanzbericht.pdf [Accessed 12 April 2018] Baluch, C., Cohen, R., Soto, H., Tucker, P., Volkan, A and Wright, G 2011. Fair Value Accounting: Current Status and A Proposal For Convergence. The International Business Economics Research Journal, 10(4), 17-29. Brigham, E. Daves, P., 2012. Intermediate Financial Management. USA: Cengage Learning. Carmichael, D.R. Graham, L., 2012. Accountants Handbook. Financial Accounting and General Topics. John Wiley Sons. Choi, R.D. Meek, G.K., 2011. International accounting. Pearson . Conceptual Framework 2016, Conceptual Framework Pronouncements. [online] Available at: https://www.aasb.gov.au/Pronouncements/Conceptual-framework.aspx [Accessed 12 April 2018] Cooper, C, Coulson, A Taylor, P. (2011). Accounting for human rights: Doxic health and safety practices The accounting lesson from ICL. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(8), 738-758. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/29fe/f2147778ed83c4ee682b6e457a70b344a28a.pdf Davies, T Crawford, I., 2012. Financial accounting. Harlow, England: Pearson. Deegan, C. M., 2011. In Financial accounting theory. North Ryde, N.S.W: McGraw-Hill Gibson, C., 2010. Financial Reporting and Analysis: Using Financial Accounting Information. Cengage Learning. Horngren, C., 2013. Financial accounting. Frenchs Forest, N.S.W, Pearson Australia Group. Kaplan, R.S., 2011. Accounting scholarship that advances professional knowledge and practice. The Accounting Review, 86(2), pp. 367383. Kruger, P., 2015. Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial economics, pp. 304-329 Lapsley, I., 2012. Commentary: Financial Accountability Management. Qualitative Research in Accounting Management, 9(3), pp. 291-292. Peirson, G, Brown, R., Easton, S, Howard, P. and Pinder, S. (2015) Business Finance, 12th ed. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Australia. Petersen, C. Plenborg, T. (2012)Financial statement analysis. Harlow, England: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.